We are very pleased to announce two new awards:
by Amanda Sengstacken
Since the devastation of October 2012’s Hurricane Sandy, enumerable concerned organizations, committees, and individuals of NYC have been toiling furiously towards a common goal. The future of New York City’s waterfront urban design is a topic of both heated debate and intricate planning – not surprisingly, as the end result promises to be one of the largest and (however necessary and well-intentioned) most disruptive urban interventions in NYC’s recent history.
Over the past 2+ years, I’ve done what I could to stay informed of large developments in the process as it inches ever closer to reality.
By the summer of 2013, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the newly-minted Presidential Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force had collaborated to form Rebuild by Design. This task force hosted a multi-stage design competition to reimagine NYC’s waterfront to be more resilient against the inevitable higher water levels and more impactful storms. Out of 148 international applicants, 10 were selected and showcased to the public.
In June 2014, the HUD jury announced the 6 winning proposals and allocated $335 million to implementing part of one of the 6 designs: a portion of “the Big U,” a design submitted by the BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group) team.
BIG’s originally proposed scope is quite extensive, forming a large “U” shape (for which the project is undoubtedly named) enveloping lower Manhattan, and envisioning a comprehensive range of urban programming combined with complex flood-preventive engineering.
The proposal is as daunting as it is exciting – so the city is moving forward by taking small bites.
First on the fork: the slice of southeastern Manhattan between Montgomery Street and 23rd street. On Thursday night, March 19th, I attended one of two Community Engagement Sessions for this massive urban design undertaking; dubbed the East Side Coastal Resiliency Project. Presented by the NYC Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency along with the BIG team and LESReady!, the meetings are intended to involve the local neighborhoods in the development of a design that will directly affect them. Thursday night’s meeting took place in Bard High School, nestled within the large NYCHA development that spans from below the aforementioned Montgomery Street up to East 13th Street.
In hopes of learning more about this area from the community that knows it best, the Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency, the Department of Design & Construction, the Parks Department, and the BIG team set up a handful of large site maps and handed out sheets of colorful stickers. Participants grouped together in front of the maps, discussing the different areas and quality of spaces, and applied the stickers that corresponded with their experiences: I love this area, My favorite waterfront view, I don’t go here, Noisy, etc. We were also handed maps and asked to sketch in our most frequent circulation routes. Meanwhile, members of the Parks department, the mayor’s office, the BIG team, the landscape design team (Starr Whitehouse) and name-tag-sporting members of seemingly a dozen other groups milled about and engaged residents in discussion.
An explanation of the project’s history and current status followed, introduced by Daniel A. Zarrilli of the NYC Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency and presented by Jeremy Seigel, BIG project designer and a project director of the Rebuild by Design team. Seigel explained the three types of intervention the team proposes to employ on a very basic level: the berm, the fixed wall, and the deployable wall. He showed precedents of the aforementioned techniques from Amsterdam, Germany, and the UK, and emphasized that the design for NYC is currently very much liquid (so to speak).
For now, essentially, the team is doing their homework. They are investigating below ground conditions and site drainage, surveying the land, sending divers under the East River to assess the waterfront structures, and inspecting bridges. The team is also analyzing the effect that a measure such as this will have on the surrounding neighborhoods – to ensure that protecting one area does not have adverse effects on another.
It’s a laborious and complex process, for which Rebuild by Design has slated 9 months of research and design development.
Though the design teams are based in NYC, they don’t profess to be experts on the idiosyncrasies of the neighborhoods whose waterfronts are slated for redesign. Out of sensitivity to this fact, the teams have been hosting meetings such as Thursday’s in order to give the residents a voice from the early stages of the design process. And while the meeting was well attended by such citizens as myself (a Brooklyn resident), one attendee expressed frustration at the lack of fellow NYCHA residents:
“I’m speaking more as someone who was born and raised in this community. This is a wonderful meeting but I don’t see my community members represented here tonight. And I cannot stress enough that you need to tell people because the waterfront is NYCHA right now. I don’t see residents from NYCHA here, and that’s a concern for me. Because something huge is about to happen in my community, and no one knows of it.”
Mr. Zarrilli responded in agreement and assured us all that the Mayor’s office et al. are doing all that they can to publicize the meetings. As the coming months progress, residents, officials, and designers would undeniably benefit from collaborating with one another as much as possible. Hopefully, the rumblings concerning the plans for this sliver of Manhattan will grow as the construction date moves closer. It will be an exciting first step towards the necessary evolution of our dear city, and the design will be all the richer if the teams are successful in their goal of community involvement.
Senior Project Architect
We seek a motivated, thoughtful and well organized Senior Project Architect with a professional degree and at least fifteen years of practical experience executing projects, preferably in NYC. Previous experience must include all phases of Project Design and Construction Administration including development of design documents, construction detailing, management of construction document production and coordination of project consultants. Candidate must be proficient at preparing complex building construction drawings and details, editing and coordinating specifications, and researching materials and building systems. Interpersonal skills are important: candidate should have the ability to openly and effectively communicate with clients and senior staff as well as mentor/train junior staff.
AutoCAD proficiency is necessary. LEED accreditation, and familiarity with Adobe applications and 3-dimensional modeling is preferred.
Email cover letter, resume and salary requirements to email@example.com. Emails shall contain one (1) pdf file no larger than 4MB.
We are very happy to announce that 4380 Bronx Boulevard has received a Housing Design Award from the Boston Society of Architects. This marks the 4th prize we’ve had the honor of receiving from the BSA, following the John C. Clancy Award for Socially Responsible Housing for Intervale Green and Louis Nine House, a Housing Design Award for True Colors Residence in 2012, and an Educational Facility Design Citation for New Settlement Community Campus in 2013.
ESKW/A is especially proud of this shelter, the design of which was headed up by Philip Jenkin, Kelly Kurlbaum, and Tatjana Sofkoska, with partner Andrew Knox. The team was able to find creative ways to flood the renovated manufacturing facility with natural light, creating a bright and airy environment.
From the jury: “Through careful material selection, the designers have created a space that is extremely hardy but avoids the drab, heavy feel of many shelters. This is a very smart, restrained project with an admirable concept.”
HAH III provides supportive housing exclusively for formerly incarcerated mothers and their children. The property is one of 7 housing properties owned and operated by Hour Children Inc., an organization dedicated to providing comprehensive help for the women and their families to build new lives together post-incarceration. We are pleased with the results of working with a strong team, and thank David for once again capturing such lovely photos.
The new year is a time for reflection, celebration … and in our case, a little silliness.
We wish you all a wonderful 2015.
On December 10th, the AIANY Architecture for Education Committee sponsored an event moderated by Mark Thaler, Educational Practice Leader of Gensler. The evening showcased two school projects in the NYC area that represent successful symbioses with their communities, “Community Schools: Process, Program, and Promise.”
ESKW/A was proud to take part in the presentation: our own Kimberly Murphy, along with Dattner Architects‘ Jeffrey Dugan and New Settlement Apartments‘ Jack Doyle, discussed the collaborative creative process and subsequent success of the New Settlement Community Campus.
Vincent Lee, Associate Partner of Rogers Partners, presented The Elmer A. Henderson: A Johns Hopkins Partnership School, for which he collaborated closely with Annette C. Anderson, Assistant Dean for Community Schools at Johns Hopkins University. Their inspiring project, a school in Baltimore that faced the unique design challenge of building within a historic area that was rapidly being rebuilt, made for an interesting comparison with NSCC. Rogers Partners and the community’s successful solutions for the unusual school program and challenging site provided us with much food for thought.
The event delivered a rich discussion on a topic we value highly; the importance of architect + community collaboration.
Jeffrey Dugan and Kimberly Murphy answered questions about the unusual creative process, in which the teams swapped schemes midway through the design scheme phase:
“We think the building came out unlike one that we would have designed alone, so in some sense when you think about community, collaboration really is part of a community action.”
“I can be honest with you, as an architect I was nervous to do that — give it away, and let someone else break it? That was really difficult. But it made us realize that (the design) was a group process, and it definitely came out better in the end than it would have been if just one person had worked on it. I think it was a real growth moment.”
Though located in areas of their respective cities that can be subject to vandalism, both projects have remained unmarred. Vincent and Jack attributed that fact to an appreciation for the buildings and their role in the community.
“I think if you were to go around the neighborhood by the school you’d see a lot of graffiti, but in the 2.5 years the building has been built, there has been no graffiti. We also have a lot of glass, and one thing that’s not uncommon nowadays in NYC is to use etching acid to graffiti glass … and there have been no incidents of that. I think that people in the community recognize that this building acknowledges and respects their children for what they are and what they should have. It’s a gift, it’s what every child should have.”